Perhaps initially we have been guided by the illusion. Especially those of us who adhere unambiguously that claim, eminently 'neocon' and therefore evil, to spread liberal democracy to the ends of the world, whatever it, including, of course, the Middle East, beaten by authoritarian regimes, if not downright totalitarian as Iran, and in which only the insulted and harassed Israel emerges as a small yet tenacious and heroic island. Will you live your particular Arab kleptocracies fall of the Berlin Wall, even analogous effect 'domino'? Do they play online, this almost uncontrollable area of \u200b\u200bfreedom so feared by any self-respecting tyrant, a role similar to that of television in those European countries subjugated by communism then? Will there finally able to show that Islam can be fully compatible with the principles and values \u200b\u200bof individual freedom and democracy that distinguish the West?
time sooner or later end up responding to these questions loaded with enthusiasm. But for now, our joy in a well. In the case of Tunisia, it appears that popular revolts have been completed leading to a simple 'take off you that I put yo', seasoned, albeit with cosmetic concessions in terms of freedoms, albeit under the tutelage of the powerful army inevitable . As for Egypt, the Mubarak regime, the object of massive street demonstrations against it, seemed to have its days numbered, especially after President Obama has explicitly withdraw their support, but the once powerful U.S. empire goes so come unless even his 'sons of bitches' they go protest, so that the Egyptian dictator has decided to resist launching the repressive springs available, and therefore, how could it be otherwise, honoring that famous epithet whose authorship is attributed to Roosevelt ('may be a bastard, but he's our son of a bitch', referring to Somoza), and how well they suit him. Meanwhile, in Yemen, Jordan, Syria, Algeria and Morocco, their respective tyrants are tempted limited to clothes to anticipate events.
not be neglected risk, certainly clear, that these supposedly democratic rebellions introduced the Trojan horse of Islamic fundamentalism. A fundamentalism that could rise to power in the countries concerned through revolution, Khomeini of Iran Semaj, or even via polls, and that surely it would have the votes of large segments of the population meant by religious fanaticism and democratic and political ignorance. Thus we would leave for Guatemala to get into 'Guatepeor', because at least most of the schemes have a work force of containment against Islamist terrorism. And a legitimate illusion would become nightmare.
0 comments:
Post a Comment